THE RACISM IN AMERICA PAGE
or "It's a 2-way street, folks!"
Any racism is stupid and bad, but it seems we've developed into a situation where racism by white people is the worst thing imaginable, deplored by everyone, yet overt racism by minorities (exploited to the max by a couple minorities in particular) is perfectly OK. Well, it isn't OK, regardless of who is practicing it.
May, 2012 - Here's a really good one - because, as it admits in the article, 1 in 3 black men and 1 in 6 Hispanic men will be incarcerated during their lifetime, compared to 1 in 17 white men, the EEOC wants to cut back on criminal background checks of prospective employees, because it "unfairly" highlights the propensity of blacks and hispanics for crime. Well, maybe if blacks and Hispanics weren't doing 6 and 3 times, respectively, as much crime as whites, they wouldn't have the hiring problem.
And now that some FACTS are coming out in the Treyvon Martin/George Zimmerman case, as opposed to the hysterical hype, as well as media and physical attacks by the press and the blacks, it's becoming clear that George Zimmerman really did defend himself against an attack by Martin:
April, 2012 - just as mentioned below, compare all the media and liberal howling about the case of Treyvon Martin, who attacked "white Hispanic" George Zimmerman, who then had to defend himself against the thug Martin beating his head into the sidewalk, to some of the following cases:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/25/arrest-made-in-beating-alabama-man/ = black mob attacks and severely beats a white man because he's white - but no "hate crime" here
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/26/suspect-attacked-white-teen-because-am-angry-about-trayvon/?intcmp=obnetwork = a couple black thugs attack a white teen solely because he's white
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/05/trayvon-martin-case-looms-over-beating-78-year-old-ohio-man/ = a gang of blacks attack a 78 year old man solely because he's white - but no hate crime here, eh?
June 5, 2010 - a recent killing and dragging of a black man by a white man has prompted cries for investigating it as a "hate crime". Isn't killing someone kind of a hateful thing to do, anyway? Isn't it odd how eagerly the authorities will pursue the "hate crimes" classification when it's a white killing a black, yet completely ignore it when it's blacks killing whites, even in the most egregious cases such as the incredibly brutal rape, torture, mutilation, and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom by a gang of black scums? The murders of Christian and Newsome went unreported by all the major media outlets, yet the recent killing of a black man by his white drinking buddy is being howled about as a "hate crime".
May 6, 2010 - think you've heard the most outrageous stories regarding the mostly-Mexican illegal aliens and their supporters? Check out THIS STORY from Fox News (ignored, of course, by liberal CNN). When you get sick of reading the daily reports of outrageous racism by the Hispanics, HERE is an example of it by the blacks. The worst thing is that such egregious examples seem to occur with increasing frequency.
January, 2010 - see HERE for a refreshingly honest view of current race relations in the US, by Pat Buchanan. See HERE for more "whitey need not apply". Can you imagine the howling from the usual agitators and rabble-rousers if these
recruiting documents had said "must be white"?
HERE is Fred
Reed's take on Affirmative Action.
Click
HERE for Fred's take on
the following story about racist Professor Henry Louis Gates. I'd say much the same (minus the reparations
issue) about Hispanics and, to a lesser extent Arabs & Muslims, with regard
to their yanking out the "prejudice" card every time things don't go their
way. JULY, 2009 - it's the same old story again with racist blacks with a
huge race chip on their shoulder. Henry Louis Gates, a man I
previously respected, gets arrested in Cambridge. Cops are called
to his house about a possible break-in. Gates is there. As any
normal person would expect, police want to ID any person they find there, to
make sure it's not a perpetrator. Does Gates cooperate with police and
show ID? No, he immediately whips out his race card and starts
screaming in ghetto-speak about the white devil slavemasters. He continues on his rant
until he gets his dumb ass arrested. Obama immediately gets
involved in a local issue he knows nothing about, comes to the aid of a
fellow black, and pronounces that the Cambridge Police "acted stupidly".
No, President Obama, they did not act stupidly; FIRST GATES DID, THEN YOU
DID.
Most of the story feedback I've read indicates that most people feel the
same as I do about this story. Unfortunately, I did not have
time when the story was breaking to save all those comments, as I did with
the Delonas story (see below). Any time a cop encounters a crime scene
or possible crime scene, he's going to want to sort out who are the good
guys and who are the bad guys.
It sounds to me that, like many if not most blacks, Gates is so racist and
so race-obsessed (he is a professor of African-American studies, after all)
that he started the whole thing by immediately whipping out the "race card".
Early reports when he was first arrested said he initially refused to
provide identification and immediately accused the cop of "harassing a black
man in America". The reason the cop was there was because a neighbor had
called in about a possible burglary in progress. So the cop is going
to want to confirm for sure that anyone present is not a criminal,
REGARDLESS OF RACE. Then, after setting a bad tone with the cop, Gates
continued on his racist rant until he got his dumb black ass arrested. I've
had a similar circumstance, only probably worse behavior on the part of the
cop, without the arrest, but it was just the circumstances in my case, not
race, same as in this case.
And for Obammy to jump in, along with the liberals, and immediately
agree that it's a race issue, just adds to the resentment whites have of
blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities who are so eager to whip out the
race card any time things don't go their way. Sometimes in life things
don't happen as we'd like, and race has nothing to do with it.
If Gates had been cooperative in the first place, and not had the racist
chip so readily available on his shoulder, none of this would have happened.
2/18/09 =
Combining
two of today's stories, where cops had to shoot a berserk chimp, and the rollout
of the dubious "Demo-rats only", "unread by anyone" stimulus bill that could
have been written by a monkey, Sean Delonas of the New York Post made this
cartoon:
People made monkey jokes about Bush for years, and this joke isn't even ABOUT
Obama, as anyone with half a brain and capable of independent thought can see.
It's (rightfully) about CONGRESS!
So, the usual "the world is so racist against me" morons like Al Sharpton and
other blacks started screaming about how terribly racist this cartoon is. The reason
white America hates Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and people like them is not
because they're black. It's because they're race-baiting, self-serving,
loud-mouthed racists who constantly try to stir up racial unrest and keep their
names in the news. Face it, without racism, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson
are nobodies. So, they keep the pot stirred with outrageous claims
like this. It helps fuel black racism by agitation. It helps
fuel white racism by increasing whites' resentments. What's even worse is
the way the stupid Politically Correct liberals jump on the bandwagon and agree
that it's racist.
The only thing that's racist here is minorities who are first & foremost racist
as hell, and second scream racism every time something doesn't go their way.
It's just like the Hispanics who say anyone is a racist if they disagree with
the Hispanics' beliefs that all borders should be eliminated and all the
illegal aliens should be given full US citizenship rights, while refusing to
adopt our language or culture.
I used to respect Hispanics as hard working people, but the more they bitch,
whine, and express their outrageous immigration views, the more people like me
resent them.
Then our new black (and rabidly anti-Second Amendment) Attorney General said the US is a racist
nation and we're "a nation of cowards". Then he hinted at the return
of Affirmative Action and racial quotas. I can see where this is
going. Also, it's very ironic that he said we're cowards about
talking frankly about race. This big protest over the cartoon is exactly
why. Blacks and other minorities can say anything they please, but whites
can't say anything without being accused of being "racist".
We've elected a black President and we have a black Attorney General, and all
these idiots can do is bitch about how racist everything is. If we were as
racist as the race-baiters claim, we would not have elected a black President.
Racist minorities who think it's OK for them to be as racist as they please, go
around with a racist chip on their shoulder, look for imagined "racism" under
every rock and in every story, and claim that anyone who disagrees with their
outlandish opinions that, as a minority, they should have special rights, only
increase the resentment of white males like me against them.
I don't give a rat's ass what color someone's skin is, but I do judge people by
their behavior, and I'm damn sick of the minorities and their whining, reverse
racism, and special
treatment. I'm sick of the racial double standard. Don Imus was fired for far less than what blacks say
about whites every day. If a black had said what Imus had said, it would
have been nothing. Black comedians routinely make jokes about whites, and
that's ok. They frequently portray whites as square, uptight, clumsy doofuses, and get away with it. But let a white comedian say something that some black idiot
looking for racism in everything decides is racist and see what happens. If what that moron New Orleans mayor said about wanting New Orleans to be a
"chocolate city" had been said by a white person wanting a "vanilla city",
loud-mouthed agitators like Sharpton would still be screaming about it years later.
And then the weak people and politically-correct liberal fools knuckle under to the outrageous demands of these
whiners, and they get away with it.
Just my opinion? Not so - here are comments from others, from CNN,
all saying the same thing I am:
1. PHIL - Not only did the cartoonist clearly not intend to attack Obama
specifically (anyone who has been within fifty feet of a news source over the
past few weeks knows that he didn't write the stimulus package), it takes
dedicated effort to find offense in this cartoon. This goes beyond
hypersensitivity into the realm of the irrational. I'm disappointed that a
columnist whom I usually admire would take such a puzzling turn. Projecting
offensive intent in order to have something to write about is beneath you.
2. FREEDOM OF SPEECH - Has anyone thought about the fact that many people
compared George W. Bush to a chimp/monkey based on his goofy facial expressions?
If everyone goes up in arms every time something comes close to being racist or
a racial slur then we wont have time in this country to work at making it
better. If the comic claims it wasn't a racial stab and is an upstanding
citizen, let him apologize for the UN-intended slight, accept it, and move on.
3. MENTOR397 - Why is it okay to portray a president as a monkey for eight
years but not his successor? Is this not an example of reverse racism right
here?
4. BRAD - I'd like to add that if the cartoon had said "They'll have to
find someone else to SIGN the next stimulus bill" rather than "WRITE", I'd
wholeheartedly agree to a racist motive. But that just isn't the case.
5. LEON - Read the caption. It's not about who signed the stimulus bill,
it's about who wrote it. Get a grip on reality. Anyone can infer what they want.
6. CALEB - People need to stop being so paranoid about racism. This was
not racist, if your too ignorant to put together the two stories; one of a mad
chimp and the other of a congress full of monkeys (which by the way i must be
referring to Burris or any other political figure of color who would be
affiliated with the stimulus bill) I mean people need to grow up and stopping
making everything about race, this is the 21st century.
7. STEVE - Do you really think Obama wrote the stimulus bill? This is Reid
and Pelosi's baby. Not Obama. If the cartoon said "sign" instead of "write" I
would agree with you completely but this is a real stretch.
8. STEPHEN DOMINGUEZ - I'm not so sure I agree with this assessment, but I
do think it's become too easy and predictable to play the race card. I think the
editorial cartoon is more an indictment against against the real authors of this
bill: Congress. Even a grade-schooler is taught the three branches of
government, and the president is part of the executive branch. The legislative
branch has an entirely different responsibility. I suggest you go back to school
and revisit who actually writes legislation before dealing the card that
everyone is sick of hearing about.
9. BILL - It is time for Sharpton, Martin and any other person, black or
not, that thinks the world revolves around the plight of the African American in
the United States, to stop asking for special attention. Racism will only go
away when race truly doesn't matter. Inferring insults when insults truly aren't
implied doesn't help the cause.
10. THESWAMI - I thought it was funny and the humour was clearly aimed at
the author(s) of the stimulus bill, regardless of who they are. Sharpton
et al need to get over themselves.
11. JIMR - Ah, here we go. Wondered when this would start. So you're
saying that this administration is off limits to the same parodies that wouldn't
have raised an eyebrow in any previous administration. Just because they used a
monkey immediately makes an attack on Obama. I think not! The meaning is that
any monkey could have written that bill. I wondered how long it was going to
take censorship of free speech was going to rear its ugly head with this
administration just because the President is an African-American. We are
treading on dangerous ground here people. We are continuing to keep the wounds
open by interpreting ANY editorial attack on this administration as racist. This
cartoon clearly was not. And continued attempts at censorship are only going to
make the situation far worse.
12. LINDA - Oh come on, how many times was George Bush compared to a
chimp? Or worse. He was repeatedly compared to Hitler and you didn't hear the
media complaining about that. Must be a slow news day.
13. JOEY - It's moronic to think that EVERY reference to an ape or gorilla
is a racist remark. What's next? Banning "Gorillas in the Mist"? Last I heard,
Obama didn't write the stimulus bill, Congress did, so trying to tie this
OBVIOUS reference to the Connecticut story to the President is a VERY VERY big
stretch.
...................................................................................
and these comments about Holder's statement:
Alfred in Virginia writes, "Holder's comments inflame unnecessarily and are
counter productive to his desired goal ..." Lou in Florida says, "You and Holder are idiots! The only cowards are those
in the media who feel an urge to be politically correct. This country elected a
person of multiple ethnicity to its highest office. What more does this country
have to do to demonstrate our color blindness?" Jerry in Massachusetts: "Holder's speech was divisive and plays right into
the hands of people who benefit from keeping us all divided."
You chose what lens to use. A million things can be offensive if you want them
to be, but are not intended to be and are not in any sort of objective analysis.
What is the future of racism in this country: mutual understanding, acceptance
and reconciliation or a bunch of old race warriors scanning every action for
some hint of offense with which to keep themselves relevant?
Take offense where it is actually intended, not where you want it to be
At work it's not uncommon to hear the sarcastic phrase: "a monkey could do your
job..." Only an idiot with a racial agenda would take offense and miss the
irony. Given the debate about the intelligence that went into this bill, I think
monkeys should be insulted that we compared them to our congressmen.
As for tying the Connecticut story and the stimulus bill story together, not
everyone thinks the way the bill was handled was done with a lot of intelligence
and thought, so it's not as hard to bridge the gap as you may think. There's a
large part of the country that doesn't positively credit Obama for every single
thing that happens in this nation, you know.
BACK TO MY RV BUILDER'S HOME
BACK TO BRIAN'S HOME